The Untold Mystery Upending Egon Schiele's Legacy

(wsj.com)

27 points | by apollinaire 12 days ago ago

11 comments

  • ggm 12 days ago ago
  • ggm 12 days ago ago

    So let's be clear: it's implicitly incest, right? One denial in this article aside, he appears to have encouraged if not caused his younger sisters eroticism as a pre teen, took her away to share a room in the hotel his parents honeymooned in, changed his art after entering a relationship. Nobody knows who the child's father is, fair enough. His pre marriage art was unquestionably "edgy"

    Amazing paintings. Also, amazingly disturbing. I cannot conceive of having one on the wall.

    • vilhelm_s 8 days ago ago

      Surely the child's father was Anton Peschka? Gertrude was engaged to him, later married him, and his mother raised the child. I don't think the article suggests otherwise.

    • alwa 8 days ago ago

      The “mystery”? I took it to be the arc of her out-of-wedlock pregnancy with her first daughter Gerti—the new awareness of which makes sense of his sister Gertrude’s shotgun marriage to the best friend Anton, and Schiele’s abrupt stylistic shift and change in lifestyle afterward. Apparently they hid her well.

    • 8 days ago ago
      [deleted]
    • hiddencost 8 days ago ago

      It's very stark, touring a gallery show of Schiele.

      Every single piece is grotesque except that work portraying his sister.

      • paganel 8 days ago ago

        That's how art is supposed to be, to raise something inside the one experiencing it. For those that want a more mundane experience from the same time-period there's also a Sargent and countless others like him.

        For reference, the one Schiele exhibition that I got to attend took place more than 15 years ago, at the Leopold Museum in Vienna itself, and for sure I didn't see it as grotesque. I was more mesmerised later that day by the Egyptian art hosted in the nearby Kunsthistorisches Museum

        • khazhoux 8 days ago ago

          I saw that same exhibition in Vienna! 2007 IIRC.

          I agree that it never struck me as grotesque. His work is bold, stark, urgent. I also find that his draftsmanship is overshadowed. He has an amazing sense of volume, told with simple linework. And his hand renderings are sublime.

      • 8 days ago ago
        [deleted]
  • 8 days ago ago
    [deleted]
  • larrywright 8 days ago ago

    I’d never heard of Schiele until yesterday when I was reading about an actor on a show I was watching. I’m not really an art buff but his work is quite interesting (if a bit disturbing at times).